Blog Archives

Check Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself: How to Create a Match Rank Order List

As you look toward the NRMP Match rank order list deadline on March 1, you’ll want to avoid simple missteps. Improving written materials and interview skills is critical, but all of that work can go to waste if applicants do not understand basic strategies for the Match. Way back in November 2015, the NRMP published an article called, “Understanding the interview and ranking behaviors of unmatched international medical students and graduates in the 2013 Main Residency Match” in the Journal of Graduate Medical Education. The data is still relevant today.

Sadly, the authors found that some applicants made strategic errors including the below:

  • Declining to rank all programs at which they interviewed or not ranking all programs they would be willing to attend.
  • Not attending all interviews, thus failing to capitalize on every opportunity to market themselves. (I suspect this error is less common now with the advent of virtual interviews.)
  • Misunderstanding the Match and, thus, ranking programs at which applicants did not interview.
  • Failing to rank programs based on true preferences or ranking programs based on the perceived likelihood of matching.

It kills me to read about these mistakes :(. Here is a video explanation of the Match algorithm. If you do not understand how the Match works, it is absolutely critical that you learn about it to avoid destructive errors.

Tags: , , ,

The NRMP is Considering a Two-phase Residency Match

Recently the NRMP requested public comment on the concept of a two-phase residency Match. In part, the plan would mitigate weaknesses in the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program (SOAP), which provides the opportunity of unfilled positions to eligible unmatched residency candidates. SOAP replaced the Scramble, an inferior system from years ago. SOAP still has its weaknesses, however, including an expedited timeline for decision-making by candidates and programs.

See a full description of the proposed two-phase residency Match here. Of note, the first Match Day, which would be analogous to the current Match Day, would occur a month earlier in February. Accordingly, interview season would be shorter. 

The plan has many benefits, but it would require some adjustments in candidates’ and residency directors’ calendars and thinking.

Tags: , , ,

Charting Outcomes in the Match 2022 is Out

The NRMP recently published their Charting Outcomes information for 2022; data I keep bookmarked and which I would recommend applicants review. The reports (for MDs and DOs) separate results into specialties and include extremely helpful information, including what mean board scores, number of contiguous ranks, and number of research experiences were for those who successfully matched – and those who did not.

It’s important to make sure you are in the range for your intended field and to compare the competitiveness of different specialties if you are seeking to apply in two fields.

Here is the MD report and the DO one.

Tags: , , ,

NRMP Match

Congrats to all those who successfully matched the week before last! The NRMP just published statistics from this year’s Main Match:

Of interest, there were 42,549 applicants who submitted certified rank order lists in this year’s Main Match, and 34,075 of those matched to PGY-1 positions (80.1%). This was a 1.6% increase over last year.

The NRMP also reports that out of 39,205 total positions offered, 36,943 filled (94.2%), and of 36,277 first-year positions offered, 34,075 (93.9%) filled. These rates were similar to last year’s. Of 6,087 total certified programs, 5,367 filled (88.2%), which was a decrease from last year, per the NRMP.

For more numbers, take a look at this NRMP press release.  

Tags: , , ,

Final Tips for Making Your Match List

Applicants must have their rank order lists certified by 9 pm EST this Wednesday (March 2). As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, the algorithm for the Match is relatively simple.

The bottom line:

1. Rank programs so they represent your true preferences. Your first choice should be first. Your second should be second and so on. Do not try to “outthink” the system, as it will only be to your disadvantage.

2. Because of the way the Match algorithm works, what programs think of you (or what you think they think of you) should have zero bearing on how you make your rank order list.

3. Except in highly usual situations, rank all programs at which you interviewed. If you would truly rather not match than be at a specific program, then that program should not be on your Match list; however, do think carefully about the prospect of not matching, entering SOAP, and possibly having to reapply next year.

4. Prioritize your happiness.

Tags: , , ,

About Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Finkel is a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Medical School. On completing her residency at Harvard, she was asked to
stay on as faculty at Harvard Medical School and spent five years teaching at the world-renowned Massachusetts General Hospital.
She was appointed to the Assistant Residency Director position for the Harvard Affiliated
Emergency Medicine Residency where she reviewed countless applications, personal statements and resumes. Read more

Receive FREE Insider Medical Admissions Tips.

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the White Coat Investor podcast:

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the FeminEm podcast: