Blog Archives

15 ERAS Tips to Boost your Residency Candidacy

Over the years, I’ve cultivated many tips for crafting the best ERAS Experience Section. I’ve included 15 important ones below:

1. Include relevant pre-professional accomplishments from college. If you conducted research, for example, list and describe it. Do not include high school achievements unless they were truly unique (worked at the White House, sang on Broadway, published in Nature ;)).

2. As of last year, you have only 10 slots, so avoid minor activities (like an afternoon health fair). 

3. Write in a streamlined fashion. Avoid verbiage. Of note, as of last year, you can choose three most meaningful activities, but you only have 300 characters for each. So while you want to explain why the activity was impactful, you’ll need to keep your writing here especially tight.

4. Use full sentences. It’s a formal application, and you want to make your written materials as readable as possible.

5. Avoid most abbreviations. Ones you think are common might not be familiar to the reader.

6. Avoid contractions; they are too informal for an ERAS. 

7. Make sure you spell out your accomplishments clearly. If your reader doesn’t understand an activity, you won’t get “full credit” for what you’ve done. Make no assumptions – not even that the reader has reviewed the experience’s introductory information (position title, location). 

8. Write about yourself and your role – not an organization. For example, don’t use the space to discuss Physicians without Borders. Use it to discuss the specifics of your role at Physicians without Borders.

9. Use numbers to be persuasive. Saying that the conference you organized had 500 participants says a lot.

10. Unless your PI won the Nobel, avoid using supervisors’ and/or doctors’ names in your descriptors as they will be meaningless to the majority of your readers.

11. Do your best not to leave the “Medical School Awards” section blank. Even if you have to simply include clerkships in which you obtained honors (or high honors), fill that section out.

12. If you have not already, consider joining your specialty’s national organization and listing it under the “Membership in Honorary/Professional Societies” section. If you are applying in two fields, take this advice, though. 

13. Try to end your entries with a sentence about how the experience you just described will help you as a future specialist. Making that connection for the reader furthers your candidacy. 

14. As with all good writing, avoid redundant language. Having the word “research” three times in two lines is distracting and demonstrates a lack of originality. 

15. Get help. Don’t submit your residency application without having it reviewed by someone with a lot of experience. (I started Insider Medical Admissions in 2007.) You do not want to put forward suboptimal materials for a process that is this important and competitive.

(Please note that there are a few changes to this year’s ERAS. For more information, see this AAMC page.)

Tags: , , ,

Get “Full Credit”

This past week I attended a high school program that included mock admissions case studies for college. Sample, fabricated applications were presented and then discussed in small groups led by a college admissions officer.

Of note, one of the individuals who led the program mentioned something that translates to medical school and residency applications: If the reader doesn’t understand, the candidate will not get full credit. It’s important to explain awards, for example, and not just name them. The illustration the admissions officer gave was “The Titan Award,” a hypothetical prize, but one that the admissions officer noted is not interpretable unless an explanation is given.

I echo the sentiment that if candidates don’t clearly define their accomplishments, those applicants may be overlooked. Make sure you detail anything that would not be readily recognizable to a reader who is not familiar with your geography, institution, or focus of study. You deserve full credit for your very hard work. 

Tags: , , ,

Charting Outcomes in the Match 2022 is Out

The NRMP recently published their Charting Outcomes information for 2022; data I keep bookmarked and which I would recommend applicants review. The reports (for MDs and DOs) separate results into specialties and include extremely helpful information, including what mean board scores, number of contiguous ranks, and number of research experiences were for those who successfully matched – and those who did not.

It’s important to make sure you are in the range for your intended field and to compare the competitiveness of different specialties if you are seeking to apply in two fields.

Here is the MD report and the DO one.

Tags: , , ,

Inaccuracies in Medical Student Grades Translate into a Residency Application Strategy

Here’s an oldie-but-goodie New York Times piece by Dr. Pauline Chen on medical student grade inaccuracies. In reading the article, medical students should reflect on how important the quality and content of their letters of recommendation are for residency applications, especially in the setting of medical school grades that may be inflated or faulty. The 2020 NRMP Program Director Survey (which is the most current version) supports the importance of letters, as well, with statistics. Make sure your letters are very strong; remember that mediocre letters should not be a part of your residency package.

Tags: , , ,

Perils of the Virtual Match

I’ve written before about the benefits of virtual interviews – both with regard to finances and equity. However, the ability to easily hoard residency interviews now has led to an unintended consequence of online access: An increase in qualified applicants who don’t match. Thomas Cook MD, an emergency medicine program director in South Carolina, covers this topic in his piece “The Virtual Match is Like the Toilet Paper Rush.” In it, he points out that when superior candidates accept a very large number of interviews, there are serious negative consequences for their peers. Cook has a suggestion for a potential remedy based on transparency. The piece is worth a read. 

Tags: , , ,

About Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Finkel is a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Medical School. On completing her residency at Harvard, she was asked to
stay on as faculty at Harvard Medical School and spent five years teaching at the world-renowned Massachusetts General Hospital.
She was appointed to the Assistant Residency Director position for the Harvard Affiliated
Emergency Medicine Residency where she reviewed countless applications, personal statements and resumes. Read more

Receive FREE Insider Medical Admissions Tips.

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the White Coat Investor podcast:

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the FeminEm podcast: