Home › Blog › Page 18

AMCAS: What’s the Big Deal about Rolling Admissions?

Posted on by by

This year’s AMCAS application opened last week, and candidates will be able to submit beginning May 30. 

Because of rolling admissions, submitting a complete application early in the cycle has distinct advantages at many schools. That doesn’t mean you should present suboptimal written materials; instead, you should start early enough (like, yesterday) that you’re showcasing your best work.

Rolling admissions means that a school takes applications in the order in which they are received and makes decisions about interviews and then acceptances, accordingly. So, as time goes by, there are fewer interview and admissions offers remaining to be made. Think of an auditorium whose doors open to allow guests in. Those in the front of the line get the seats, and those who come later may not have a chair to sit in.

If your application is not complete, your candidacy may not be evaluated early when there are more opportunities for interviews and admissions. So, if you have not already, get started immediately. It could make a huge difference in your available opportunities.

Tags: , , ,

Ten AMCAS Mistakes You Absolutely Want to Avoid

Posted on by by

Here’s a quick and dirty list of AMCAS Work and Activities section errors to avoid at all costs:

1. Don’t write to write, and don’t fill to the maximum character count unless necessary. While you want to include many strong achievements, you do not want your AMCAS to be so wordy that your reader is tempted to skim.

2. While you need to be brief, don’t write in phrases; use full sentences. It’s a formal application, and you want to make your written materials as readable as possible.

3. Don’t assume your reader will carefully study the “header” section (including the title of the activity, hours, etc.). Make sure your descriptor could stand alone: Instead of “As an assistant, I conducted experiments…” use “As a research assistant at a Stanford Medical School neuroscience lab, I conducted experiments…”

4. Don’t be vague or trite. Make sure you spell out your accomplishments clearly and substantively. If your reader doesn’t understand an activity, you will not get “full credit” for what you’ve done. Make no assumptions.

5. Avoid abbreviations. Again, you want to be formal, and abbreviations you think are common might not be familiar to the reader.

6. Write about yourself and your role – not an organization. For example, don’t use the space to discuss Doctors without Borders. Use it to discuss the specifics of your role at Doctors without Borders.

7. Avoid generalities and consider using numbers to be persuasive. Saying that the conference you organized had 300 participants says it all.

8. Don’t merge the descriptors with the most meaningful paragraphs because they are separate sections: You can complete descriptors for up to 15 activities with up to 700 characters each plus up to three most meaningful paragraphs of up to 1325 characters each.

9. Unless your PI won the Nobel, avoid using supervisors’ and/or doctors’ names in your descriptors as they will be meaningless to the majority of your readers.

10. Choose the right category for each activity, so you get “full credit.”

Bonus: Get help. Do not submit your medical school application without having it reviewed by someone with experience. You do not want to showcase suboptimal materials for a process that is this important and competitive.

 

Tags: , , ,

Letters of Recommendation: Lead the Witness

Posted on by by

When pre-meds, medical students, residents, nurses, and physician colleagues asked me to write them letters of recommendation (LORs) when I was Assistant Residency Director, the first thing I requested was that they send me background information to make my letter robust…and my job easier. Accordingly, whether you are applying to medical school, dental school, residency, or fellowship, I strongly recommend you create a “LOR packet,” which can include the following:

1. A brief, well-written cover letter defining all of your important accomplishments
2. Your curriculum vitae (CV)
3. Your personal statement in its final form and/or
4. Your transcripts.

With regard to the cover letter, keep it streamlined: Thank the writer and highlight your pre-professional achievements on one page. The point of the cover letter is to supplement a writer’s knowledge of your candidacy and offer flattering content for inclusion. A college professor may know  you made the only A in an organic chemistry class, but her LOR for medical school will be more complete, and she will demonstrate a more intimate familiarity with you if she knows enough to write that you volunteer regularly at a homeless shelter.

With regard to the CV and personal statement, these make useful supplements to the LOR packet only if they are in professional and final form. Don’t include rough drafts. Poorly organized background information leaves your writer with the impression that you are a disorganized person. Also, only include the transcript if it bolsters your candidacy, demonstrating academic achievement. Don’t shoot yourself in the foot if you have some bad grades you’d rather not showcase.

Bottom line: An applicant who offered me a list of her accomplishments in a tidy, accessible package was more likely to get a strong, comprehensive letter that was submitted promptly. She also distinguished herself from the majority of candidates who requested letters without demonstrating a comparably sophisticated understanding of the demands this process made on my time. If you can make a letter writer’s job easier, your forethought is likely to pay dividends in the letter you receive. The savvy applicant can take subtle advantage of her ability to “lead the witness.”

Tags: , , ,

Match Results 2023: Why Did Emergency Medicine Do So Badly?

Posted on by by

Emergency medicine has had its ups and downs over the years with regard to desirability. Soon after the show “ER” became popular, emergency medicine programs also were suddenly in vogue. Over the interim years, the field’s cachet has declined and increased, but up until recent years, emergency medicine programs routinely filled 99% of their available spots in the Match.

The fact that 554 emergency spots went unfilled in this past Match was particularly distasteful to many emergency physicians, accordingly.

The reasons for this plummeting interest in the field is well described in a recent piece in ACEP Now. (ACEP stands for the American College of Emergency Physicians.) The authors note multiple issues, including burnout, decreasing remuneration, and systemic problems in the emergency healthcare system that frustrate clinicians. 

Of note, these issues have driven out many middle-aged emergency physicians, as well.

Even if you are not interested in becoming an emergency doctor, take a look at the piece here, keeping in mind that certain factors may soon adversely affect other specialties as well.

(I’d like to give a shout out to my old friend Jonathan Fisher MD MPH who was one of the reporters on this article.) 

Tags: , , ,

Changes in the AMCAS

Posted on by by

Premeds applying this cycle will notice a few changes to the AMCAS. There are no drastic modifications, so don’t worry, but it’s worth knowing what to expect.

Back in 2012, an important, new addition appeared on the AMCAS: Applicants were being asked to identify their most significant extracurricular experiences (up to three) and support their choices with more writing. Now the Most Meaningful Paragraphs are par for the course, but the change was a big surprise back then.

This year the updates are comparatively minor. One difference is the Other Impactful Experiences section. It is not an addition, however. It replaces the Disadvantaged Status section, allowing for a broader understanding of challenges that can adversely affect an applicant’s life and candidacy.

To their credit, the AAMC also changed the “other” pronoun and gender identity categories to “another pronoun set” and  “another gender identity.”

Please see this short article from the AAMC regarding other changes in this year’s AMCAS.

Tags: , , ,

About Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Finkel is a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Medical School. On completing her residency at Harvard, she was asked to
stay on as faculty at Harvard Medical School and spent five years teaching at the world-renowned Massachusetts General Hospital.
She was appointed to the Assistant Residency Director position for the Harvard Affiliated
Emergency Medicine Residency where she reviewed countless applications, personal statements and resumes. Read more

Receive FREE Insider Medical Admissions Tips.

Sign Up

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the White Coat Investor podcast:

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the FeminEm podcast: