A Novel Approach: Reading throughout your Rotations

I had a thoughtful advisee years back who told me about an interesting plan she had made for herself: As she rotated through different specialties during medical school, she read a book appropriate to each field. For internal medicine, she read “Being Mortal,” by Atul Gawande. For neurology, she read the classic “The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat,” by Oliver Sacks. For surgery, she read “When Breath Becomes Air,” a beautiful book by Paul Kalanithi. The list goes on.

I was impressed by this contemplative approach to third and fourth year. So many of us are understandably focused on Shelf Exams and letters of recommendation that we don’t give ourselves a chance to comprehensively reflect on our subject matter and patients’ experiences.

If you have a moment, please check out a few book recommendations I have for those in the medical field. Perhaps my advisee’s stellar plan can be one that other medical students adopt. (You’ll see that I strongly recommend Cutting for Stone. Dr. Abraham Verghese has a new book out that I’m reading right now called The Covenant of Water.)

Tags: , , ,

“Optional” Secondary Essays: Are They Really?

I’ve recently received several questions about optional secondary essays and their necessity.

The beauty of an “additional comments” section is that it is intentionally vague. It’s your chance to provide details, context, or qualifications that the structure of the application didn’t allow you to present. For that reason, I lean toward using that space to both highlight who you are and any exceptional aspect of your candidacy that you’d want a reader to know before making an interview decision.

So, one good option for these essays is to pick something completely nonmedical that distinguishes you and is nowhere else to be found on your application. In this case, the essay can actually be fun to write.

Of note, sometimes people use this type of a prompt to explain one major deficiency in their candidacy. I only recommend that if there’s a big elephant in the room: In other words, in general I tell applicants – throughout the process – to avoid highlighting weaknesses. The goal is to demonstrate distinctiveness and worthiness, so negatives are usually left out. But sometimes someone has a big problem like a low MCAT score that is an anomaly that’s worth addressing head on.

Bottom line:  Since an interview isn’t guaranteed, don’t save your best material for an in-person meeting. Get your foot in the door. And as always, make sure your essay is substantive and not fluffy.

Tags: , , ,

Don’t Let ERAS Kick Y’ERAS

Just a reminder for residency applicants: ERAS tokens are now available for IMGs, and all residency candidates can start registering and submitting supporting documents on the myERAS website. Even if you aren’t ready to start working on your application, I’d recommend registering and taking a look at what will be required of you. 

Additionally, I suggest you begin researching programs now, if you haven’t already. Residency Explorer allows you to compare your candidacy to those of applicants who have successfully matched to specific residency training programs in the past. You can also search the American Medical Association’s FREIDA database.

Getting started early will help you develop confidence and a strong plan of attack for the upcoming application season.

Tags: , , ,

The Ins and Outs of Choosing a Specialty: The Generalist vs. The Early Committer

For many third-year med students, this is a challenging time of year. Preparing an ERAS can be daunting, but it’s even worse if you don’t know what specialty you want to practice. Here’s a short piece I wrote with my colleague David Presser MD MPH called “Choosing a Specialty: The Generalist vs. The Early Committer.” And here’s a complementary, but non-medical, New York Times article called “You Don’t Want a Child Prodigy” that’s a great follow up to our piece. 

Tags: , , ,

Moral Injury

It’s troubling, but make sure to read this recent piece in the New York Times called “The Moral Crisis of America’s Doctors” about physicians’ “moral injury.” The phrase refers to emotional damage caused to workers – when in the course of fulfilling their duties – they commit an act or acts that conflict with their core values. The piece argues that, in part, our profit-driven system causes doctors moral injury and, in turn, they become depressed and/or burned out.

I remember many times when I had only bad alternatives in directing my emergency patients for follow-up: If they had no insurance, our knowledgeable social workers advised us that our sole option was to send those patients to the public hospital nearby for follow-up care. This meant I would splint someone with a non-operative, non-emergency fracture and advise him/her to then be seen at another hospital’s emergency department with a multiple-hour wait because that was the only way to get into the system for the affordable orthopedic clinic. I found this very upsetting and contrary to what seemed right to me: It was so hard on the patients, and it also burdened the already overwhelmed medical system.

If you’re interested in recent physician burnout statistics, please see this February 2023 blog on the topic.

Tags: , , ,

About Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Michelle Finkel

Dr. Finkel is a graduate of Stanford University and Harvard Medical School. On completing her residency at Harvard, she was asked to
stay on as faculty at Harvard Medical School and spent five years teaching at the world-renowned Massachusetts General Hospital.
She was appointed to the Assistant Residency Director position for the Harvard Affiliated
Emergency Medicine Residency where she reviewed countless applications, personal statements and resumes. Read more

Receive FREE Insider Medical Admissions Tips.

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the White Coat Investor podcast:

Listen to Dr. Finkel’s interview on the FeminEm podcast: